![softube tape vs satin softube tape vs satin](https://www.producerspot.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/softube-tape-review.jpg)
Like FabFilter’s Saturn, these are simplistic models that only focus on saturation, but again, this can be a nice bonus, helping to keep CPU usage low and avoiding distractions like minor offset levels. Saturator X includes several tape modes as well as other interesting options.
Softube tape vs satin upgrade#
Despite the upgrade to the second version, the plug-in still does not load the computer processor and has advanced options for coloring your material.
![softube tape vs satin softube tape vs satin](https://www.fullcompass.com/common/products/lg/239366.jpg)
The three Saturn tape styles simulate the saturation and frequency response of the tape, but the instrument does not offer other features such as noise or wah as it acts as an extended saturator. Separate noise control is a nice bonus and a relatively unusual feature among tape emulation plugins. Reelbus 4 doesn’t bother with ribbon knobs – it’s a clean and easy-to-use tabbed interface for grouping functions related to flanging, delay, and ribbon stop / start effects. See also: IK Multimedia announces ARC System 3 - 3. Actual updates are no longer to be found, but you can read flattering reviews from the distant 2011, when this plugin became a discovery for the digital market. The third version is built directly into the Cubase mixer, and the MkIII is available as a plug-in. The original Magneto tape emulator pays tribute to the days when Steinberg first introduced the VST standard. Since it has been on the market for a long time, it can be found in many well-known works as an alternative to basic saturators. It’s not the ultra-precise tape model we might expect from modern plugins, but it does provide a tasty saturation that sounds really good. This plugin has been around for many years, becoming really vintage in a way. With this basic knowledge in place, let’s check out a dozen of our favorite tape emulation plugins.
![softube tape vs satin softube tape vs satin](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/54d696e5e4b05ca7b54cff5c/1626361699239-C19ZNSGISHM3LOZNEUVG/tape+emulation-2.jpg)
This means that added harmonics disappear quickly as they become higher in frequency, more like a triangular wave than a square wave. There is no unexpected hard ceiling like in the AD converter – instead, there is a smooth curve that begins to round and tame the peaks in the signal long before they reach the limit. The tape approaches this limit very gradually and carefully. There are several common characteristics we associate with tape sound, the most important of which is saturation. Various lineups were also available: the humble compact cassette had three general types (iron, chrome and metal), each of which sounded very different, and three possible different noise cancellation systems (Dolby B, C, or S, although the latter is rare).
Softube tape vs satin professional#
The tapes were in different widths, from two inches to 1/8 “for compact cassettes and tape speed can range from 30 ips on a professional machine to as little as 1,875 ips on a compact cassette. There are many types of cassette decks today: later models can achieve extremely high fidelity, while earlier or cheaper models can significantly color the sound before it even hits tape.